EXIMYug / CASE STUDIES / CASE 01
CASE 01 · EDPMS / e-BRC mismatch

42 export bills open despite payment realization

A Client · Engineering exporter · Germany + UAE. Payment had arrived, but the export cycle was still not closed.

THE CHALLENGE

EDPMS / e-BRC mismatch

Payment had arrived, but the export cycle was still not closed.

VALUE / EXPOSURE₹3.8 Cr
EXPECTED TIMELINE30–45 days
MARKETGermany + UAE

Constraints

  • Multiple shipping bills mapped to consolidated inward remittances
  • Different bank reference formats across realization records
  • Historic documents stored across finance, CHA and bank email trails
  • Closure depended on AD-bank validation rather than exporter action alone
MEASUREMENT

KPIs that determine whether the case is moving

KPI 01Open bills reduced
KPI 02₹ value reconciled
KPI 03Average closure age
KPI 04First-pass bank acceptance
NORTH STAR METRIC₹ value moved from OPEN/STUCK to verified CLOSED
EXPECTED JOURNEY

From problem statement to verified end state

01

Ingest

Ingest shipping bills, invoices, IRMs and e-BRC data

02

Match

Match payment to shipment and identify unmatched values

03

Build

Build exception list by bill, amount, age and evidence gap

04

Prepare

Prepare bank-ready closure packs and correction requests

05

Track

Track each bill until verified CLOSED

SOLUTION DESIGN

What EXIMYug does

A transaction graph reconciles shipping bills, invoices and realization evidence, isolates unmatched values and converts each exception into an owner/action queue.

01 · OUTCOMES

Operational outcomes

  • 42 bills classified by exact closure blocker
  • Evidence gaps converted into document requests
  • Bank-ready packs created per exception
  • Closure status tracked transaction-by-transaction
02 · GOVERNMENT COMPLIANCE

Government workflow

RBI export-realization framework; EDPMS records; e-BRC/DGFT linkage where applicable.

03 · REGULATORY

Regulatory considerations

AD-bank reconciliation and closure process; realization evidence and permitted exception handling.

04 · LEGAL

Legal / authority boundary

No representation that EXIMYug can alter EDPMS itself; final closure remains with the authorized dealer bank / relevant authority.

END EXECUTION PLAN

Owner-driven execution, not an advisory report

01Normalize

Ingest shipping bills, invoices, IRMs and e-BRC data

02Match

Match payment to shipment and identify unmatched values

03Evidence

Build exception list by bill, amount, age and evidence gap

04Bank route

Prepare bank-ready closure packs and correction requests

05Verify

Track each bill until verified CLOSED

END STATE + IMPACT

₹ value moved from OPEN/STUCK to verified CLOSED

The case is managed toward a measurable end state, with unresolved authority decisions explicitly separated from work EXIMYug can execute or coordinate.

IMPACT 01Lower unresolved export receivables
IMPACT 02Cleaner compliance trail
IMPACT 03Faster finance-team reconciliation

Case outcome values describe the operating end-state model and measurement framework; actual recoveries, approvals and timelines depend on transaction evidence and decisions by the relevant buyer, bank, insurer, carrier or authority.

Facing this type of export problem?

Start with the transaction, evidence, amount at stake and current blocker.

All Case Studies